Archive    Search
September 2010

U.S. Chamber Concerned Over Baucus Health Care Reform Bill

Publication Date: 
September 2009

 
The U.S. Chamber applauded a Senate Finance Committee health care reform bill introduced as "the best effort to date," but cautioned that the tax provisions included in the bill could "spiral out of control."

Sen. Max Baucus (D-MT) introduced the $856 billion "America's Healthy Future Act" on September 17 after months of delays and stalled bipartisan negotiations. In a statement released to the press, Chamber Executive Vice President for Government Affairs Bruce Josten thanked Baucus for his "inclusive efforts" and "good faith effort to address the concerns of the U.S. Chamber," particularly on the strongly-opposed government-run public insurance option. 

"We applaud the provisions in this bill that will lower health care costs, increase coverage, and improve the quality of care. These range from fairly regulating the insurance market to enacting tax parity for small businesses and the self employed," Josten said. "We strongly support allowing plans to be sold nationally and allowing individuals to purchase health insurance across state lines. This bill does not contain a government-run 'public option,' and the Congressional Budget Office has certified it as the first comprehensive health reform bill that will actually bend the cost curve and get health care costs under control."

However, Josten went on to note, "We have grave concerns over the vast array of new taxes contained in the bill. This bill creates a new tax on benefits that may well spiral out of control to become the next Alternative Minimum Tax. It taxes prescriptions, insurance policies, medical devices, clinics and labs' and all of these taxes will increase costs for employers and workers. Not to mention, the bill creates a massive new entitlement in the form of insurance credits that will burden taxpayers now and in the future. Overall, the bill still needs tremendous improvement."

The bill would, among other things,

  • create an individual mandate for health insurance, with fees as high as $3,800 on families who don't get coverage; and provide tax credits to help low- and middle-income families purchase coverage;
  • create nonprofit health care cooperatives;
  • ban insurance companies from dropping policyholders who get sick;
  • provide protections for those with preexisting conditions;
  • ban insurance companies from imposing annual caps or lifetime limits on coverage; and
  • create incentives for states to develop and test alternatives to the medical malpractice system.
     

The plan is financed by more than $500 billion in various spending reductions, including Medicare, and almost $350 billion in new taxes and fees. Insurers would be hit with $6 billion in new fees, with another $4 billion in fees for makers of medical devices. Smaller sums would come from drug makers and clinical laboratories. Insurers providing expensive "Cadillac" plans would be hit with a tax of 35% for plans valued over a certain threshold.

 

Comments

David W. Boone 10/12/2009 3:10:17 AM

We cannot afford to lose more small business because of increased costs. With all of the special requirements that we face now to be able to continue to run a profitable business we cannot take on more expense. My business furnishes material for our warfighters and we will probably be forced out of business with added costs. (Southlake, tx)




richard maggio 10/12/2009 3:10:17 AM

If the Bill allows Insurance Companies to cross State Borders and therby reduce a lot of waste and improve competition it will benefit consumers.If it keeps the public option off the table then its heading in the right direction. (oxnard, ca)




Joseph Schneider 10/12/2009 3:10:17 AM

I have a disabled child, and with insurance this still creates a financial burden on my family. More and more supplies are available over the counter and not covered by insurance, out of pocket expences need to exceed 8,000.00 before tax credits kick in. With the new plan I'm told that amount would go up to 20,000.00. With budget cuts for disabled programs I see less for my money and congress spending more. I have not heard one word that help families in our position. I hear of percentages of people of X age groups that could or should be covered but are not. I want to hear a bill that explains how the improved system will help the public not be a deceptive tax loop hole for the 1% (Hoffman Estates, IL)




Michelle Kuntz 10/12/2009 3:10:17 AM

All of the increased "hidden" taxes will fuel inflation and put more people out of work. If you can't afford insurance, where does the money come from to pay the fine for not having it? Put those who can't in debtor prison, and then, finally, you will have free health care along with three squares. What a system! (Lolo, MT)




Post new comment

To have your comment considered for reprint in the U.S. Chamber's monthly print publication, Free Enterprise, please include your city and state below.
Please type your comment in the box below. (Please do not include HTML code.)